Diffusive MHD Instabilities: Beyond the Chandrasekhar Theorem
Guenther Ruediger, Manfred Schultz, Frank Stefani, and Michael Mond

TL;DR
This paper investigates the stability of magnetized cylindrical flows with azimuthal magnetic fields, revealing a diffusive magnetorotational instability that occurs beyond classical ideal fluid stability criteria, especially at low magnetic Prandtl numbers.
Contribution
It demonstrates the existence of a diffusive azimuthal magnetorotational instability in flows with finite diffusivity, extending Chandrasekhar's ideal fluid stability results to more realistic conditions.
Findings
Instability occurs at lower fields and rotation rates than predicted by ideal theory.
The instability domain scales with Reynolds and Hartmann numbers for low magnetic Prandtl numbers.
The Tayler instability appears at small Hartmann numbers, displacing the magnetorotational instability.
Abstract
The magnetohydrodynamic stability of axially unbounded cylindrical flows is considered which contain a toroidal magnetic background field with the same radial profile as the linear azimuthal velocity. Chandrasekhar (1956) has shown for ideal fluids the stability of this configuration if the Alfven velocity of the field equals the velocity of the background flow. It is demonstrated for magnetized Taylor-Couette flows at the Rayleigh line, however, that for finite diffusivity such flows become unstable against nonaxisymmetric perturbations where the critical magnetic Reynolds number of the rotation rate does not depend on the magnetic Prandtl number Pm if Pm much << 1. In order to study this new diffusive azimuthal magnetorotational instability, flows and fields with the same radial profile but with different amplitudes are considered. For Pm << 1 the instability domain with the weakest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
