Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and the gang: The true history of the concepts of limit and shadow
Tiziana Bascelli, Emanuele Bottazzi, Frederik Herzberg, Vladimir, Kanovei, Karin Katz, Mikhail Katz, Tahl Nowik, David Sherry, Steven Shnider

TL;DR
This paper explores the historical development of the concepts of limit and shadow, highlighting how Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy used approximate equality and negligible terms, connecting their ideas to modern infinitesimal theories.
Contribution
It clarifies the historical evolution of limits and shadows, linking classical methods to contemporary infinitesimal frameworks and demonstrating their application to real functions.
Findings
Historical methods align with modern infinitesimal concepts
Application to decreasing rearrangements of functions
Bridges historical and modern analytic ideas
Abstract
Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy all used one or another form of approximate equality, or the idea of discarding "negligible" terms, so as to obtain a correct analytic answer. Their inferential moves find suitable proxies in the context of modern theories of infinitesimals, and specifically the concept of shadow. We give an application to decreasing rearrangements of real functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
