Bounding sums of the M\"obius function over arithmetic progressions
Lynnelle Ye

TL;DR
This paper improves bounds on sums of the Möbius function over arithmetic progressions, matching the best known bounds for the univariate case without restrictions on the modulus or residue, under the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis.
Contribution
It extends previous results to establish the same bounds for $M(x;q,a)$ as for $M(x)$, removing size and divisibility restrictions on the modulus and residue.
Findings
Bound on $M(x;q,a)$ matches Soundararajan's bound for $M(x)$
No restrictions on size or divisibility of $q$ and $a$
Results assume the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis
Abstract
Let where is the M\"obius function. It is well-known that the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the assertion that for all . There has been much interest and progress in further bounding under the assumption of the Riemann Hypothesis. In 2009, Soundararajan established the current best bound of \[ M(x)\ll\sqrt{x}\exp\left((\log x)^{1/2}(\log\log x)^c\right) \] (setting to , though this can be reduced). Halupczok and Suger recently applied Soundararajan's method to bound more general sums of the M\"obius function over arithmetic progressions, of the form \[ M(x;q,a)=\sum_{\substack{n\le x \\ n\equiv a\pmod{q}}}\mu(n). \] They were able to show that assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, satisfies \[ M(x;q,a)\ll_{\epsilon}\sqrt{x}\exp\left((\log x)^{3/5}(\log\log…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
