How good are detection proposals, really?
Jan Hosang, Rodrigo Benenson, Bernt Schiele

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates the effectiveness of various object detection proposal methods, analyzing their recall, repeatability, and impact on detector performance to inform better selection for different applications.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of ten object proposal methods, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses to guide future improvements and applications.
Findings
Existing methods have notable weaknesses in recall and repeatability.
Detection proposals significantly influence detector performance.
Insights help select appropriate methods for specific settings.
Abstract
Current top performing Pascal VOC object detectors employ detection proposals to guide the search for objects thereby avoiding exhaustive sliding window search across images. Despite the popularity of detection proposals, it is unclear which trade-offs are made when using them during object detection. We provide an in depth analysis of ten object proposal methods along with four baselines regarding ground truth annotation recall (on Pascal VOC 2007 and ImageNet 2013), repeatability, and impact on DPM detector performance. Our findings show common weaknesses of existing methods, and provide insights to choose the most adequate method for different settings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
