Implications of a 20-Hz Booster cycle-rate for Slip-stacking
Jeffrey Eldred, Robert Zwaska

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the effects of increasing the Booster cycle-rate from 15-Hz to 20-Hz on slip-stacking, highlighting impacts on bucket area, RF interference, and beam parameters, with potential mitigation strategies.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of slip-stacking implications between 15-Hz and 20-Hz Booster cycle-rates, including potential solutions to mitigate increased aperture requirements.
Findings
20-Hz cycle-rate increases slip-stacking bucket area
RF interference losses can be reduced by a factor of 4-10
A different injection scheme can eliminate the need for larger momentum aperture
Abstract
We examine the potential impacts to slip-stacking from a change of the Booster cycle-rate from 15- to 20-Hz. We find that changing the Booster cycle-rate to 20-Hz would greatly increase the slip-stacking bucket area, while potentially requiring greater usage of the Recycler momentum aperture and additional power dissipation in the RF cavities. In particular, the losses from RF interference can be reduced by a factor of 4-10 (depending on Booster beam longitudinal parameters). We discuss the aspect ratio and beam emittance requirements for efficient slip-stacking in both cycle-rate cases. Using a different injection scheme can eliminate the need for greater momentum aperture in the Recycler.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle accelerators and beam dynamics · Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers · Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
