Mining the modular structure of protein interaction networks
Ariel Berenstein, Janet Pi\~nero, Laura Ines Furlong, Ariel, Chernomoretz

TL;DR
This paper compares different clustering algorithms for protein interaction networks to understand how their modular decompositions influence biological insights, highlighting the importance of high-resolution methods like infomap.
Contribution
It analyzes the impact of different clustering algorithms on biological interpretation and introduces the significance of high-resolution modular descriptions in revealing meaningful biological associations.
Findings
Infomap uncovers significant associations in aging-related proteins.
Different clustering methods yield varying biological insights.
Sub-optimal partitions can still be valuable for meso-scale analysis.
Abstract
Cluster-based descriptions of biological networks have received much attention in recent years fostered by accumulated evidence of the existence of meaningful correlations between topological network clusters and biological functional modules. Several well-performing clustering algorithms exist to infer topological network partitions. However, due to respective technical idiosyncrasies they might produce dissimilar modular decompositions of a given network. In this contribution, we aimed to analyze how alternative modular descriptions could condition the outcome of follow-up network biology analysis. We considered a human protein interaction network and two paradigmatic cluster recognition algorithms, namely: the Clauset-Newman-Moore and the infomap procedures. We analyzed at what extent both methodologies yielded different results in terms of granularity and biological congruency. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
