Atmospheric Mass Loss During Planet Formation: The Importance of Planetesimal Impacts

TL;DR

This paper quantifies atmospheric mass loss during planet formation, emphasizing the significant role of planetesimal impacts alongside giant impacts, using analytic and numerical methods to model impact effects on atmospheres.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of atmospheric loss mechanisms from both giant impacts and planetesimal impacts, highlighting the importance of planetesimals in atmospheric evolution.

Findings

Giant impacts cause global ground motion leading to atmospheric loss.

Impact velocity and mass influence local and global atmospheric loss fractions.

Planetesimal impacts, especially from impactors just above a certain size, are highly effective in atmospheric erosion.

Abstract

We quantify the atmospheric mass loss during planet formation by examining the contributions to atmospheric loss from both giant impacts and planetesimal accretion. Giant impacts cause global motion of the ground. Using analytic self-similar solutions and full numerical integrations we find (for isothermal atmospheres with adiabatic index ($\gamma=5/3$) that the local atmospheric mass loss fraction for ground velocities $v_g < 0.25 v_{esc}$ is given by $\chi_{loss}=(1.71 v_g/v_{esc})^{4.9}$, where $v_{esc}$ is the escape velocity from the target. Yet, the global atmospheric mass loss is a weaker function of the impactor velocity $v_{Imp}$ and mass $m_{Imp}$ and given by $X_{loss} ~ 0.4x+1.4x^2-0.8x^3$ (isothermal atmosphere) and $X_{loss} ~ 0.4x+1.8x^2-1.2x^3$ (adiabatic atmosphere), where $x=(v_{Imp}m/v_{esc}M)$. Atmospheric mass loss due to planetesimal impacts proceeds in two different regimes: 1) Large enough impactors $m > \sqrt{2} \rho_0 (\pi h R)^{3/2}$ (25~km for the current Earth), are able to eject all the atmosphere above the tangent plane of the impact site, which is $h/2R$ of the whole atmosphere, where $h$, $R$ and $\rho_0$ are the atmospheric scale height, radius of the target, and its atmospheric density at the ground. 2) Smaller impactors, but above $m>4 \pi \rho_0 h^3$ (1~km for the current Earth) are only able to eject a fraction of the atmospheric mass above the tangent plane. We find that the most efficient impactors (per unit impactor mass) for atmospheric loss are planetesimals just above that lower limit and that the current atmosphere of the Earth could have resulted from an equilibrium between atmospheric erosion and volatile delivery to the atmosphere from planetesimals. We conclude that planetesimal impacts are likely to have played a major role in atmospheric mass loss over the formation history of the terrestrial planets. (Abridged)