What we talk about when we talk about fields
Ewan Cameron

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the mathematical and computational aspects of Bayesian inference for reconstructing infinite-dimensional fields from finite noisy data in astronomy, aiming to improve understanding and application within the community.
Contribution
It provides an applied statistical perspective to clarify the mathematical framing and computational methods for Bayesian field inference in astronomical studies.
Findings
Clarifies the mathematical devices for Bayesian field analysis.
Explains the diversity of computational procedures for posterior recovery.
Offers insights from applied statistics and geostatistics.
Abstract
In astronomical and cosmological studies one often wishes to infer some properties of an infinite-dimensional field indexed within a finite-dimensional metric space given only a finite collection of noisy observational data. Bayesian inference offers an increasingly-popular strategy to overcome the inherent ill-posedness of this signal reconstruction challenge. However, there remains a great deal of confusion within the astronomical community regarding the appropriate mathematical devices for framing such analyses and the diversity of available computational procedures for recovering posterior functionals. In this brief research note I will attempt to clarify both these issues from an "applied statistics" perpective, with insights garnered from my post-astronomy experiences as a computational Bayesian / epidemiological geostatistician.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
