Dust environment and dynamical history of a sample of short period comets
F.J. Pozuelos, F. Moreno, F. Aceituno, V. Casanova, A. Sota, J.J., L\'opez-Moreno, J. Castellano, E. Reina, A. Diepvens, A. Betoret, B., H\"ausler, C. Gonz\'alez, D. Rodr\'iguez, E. Bryssinck, E. Cort\'es, F., Garc\'ia, F. Garc\'ia, F. Lim\'on, F. Grau, F. Fratev, F. Baldr\'is

TL;DR
This study analyzes the dust environment and dynamical evolution of 9 short period comets, categorizing their activity levels and estimating their ages within the Jupiter Family region using observational data and numerical modeling.
Contribution
It provides a detailed characterization of dust parameters and dynamical histories for a sample of short period comets, highlighting correlations between activity and age in the Jupiter Family region.
Findings
Comets are categorized into weakly, moderately, and highly active based on dust emission.
The comets are relatively young in the Jupiter Family region, with ages from 100 to 600 years.
A possible correlation exists between comet activity level and time spent in the Jupiter Family region.
Abstract
Aims. In this work, we present an extended study of the dust environment of a sample of short period comets and their dynamical history. With this aim, we characterized the dust tails when the comets are active, and we made a statistical study to determine their dynamical evolution. The targets selected were 22P/Kopff, 30P/Reinmuth 1, 78P/Gehrels 2, 115P/Maury, 118P/Shoemaker-Levy 4, 123P/West-Hartley, 157P/Tritton, 185/Petriew, and P/2011 W2 (Rinner). Methods. We use two different observational data: a set of images taken at the Observatorio de Sierra Nevada and the Afrho curves provided by the amateur astronomical association Cometas-Obs. To model these observations, we use our Monte Carlo dust tail code. From this analysis, we derive the dust parameters, which best describe the dust environment: dust loss rates, ejection velocities, and size distribution of particles. On the other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
