The Black Hole Mass Scale of Classical and Pseudo Bulges in Active Galaxies
Luis C. Ho (1,2), Minjin Kim (2,3) ((1) Kavli Institute for Astronomy, and Astrophysics, (2) The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for, Science, (3) Korea Astronomy, Space Science Institute)

TL;DR
This study refines the black hole mass estimation in active galaxies by calibrating separate virial factors for classical and pseudo bulges, revealing their structural differences and implications for galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It provides distinct virial coefficient calibrations for classical and pseudo bulges in AGNs, improving black hole mass estimates and understanding of bulge influence on broad-line region dynamics.
Findings
Different $f$ factors for bulge types: 6.3 for classical, 3.2 for pseudo bulges.
Evidence of recent star formation correlating with Eddington ratio.
Potential of $M_{\rm BH}-M_{\rm bulge}$ relation as an alternative to $\sigma_*$ relation.
Abstract
The mass estimator used to calculate black hole (BH) masses in broad-line active galactic nuclei (AGNs) relies on a virial coefficient (the " factor") that is determined by comparing reverberation-mapped (RM) AGNs with measured bulge stellar velocity dispersions against the relation of inactive galaxies. It has recently been recognized that only classical bulges and ellipticals obey a tight relation; pseudobulges have a different zero point and much larger scatter. Motivated by these developments, we reevaluate the factor for RM AGNs with available measurements, updated H RM lags, and new bulge classifications based on detailed decomposition of high-resolution ground-based and space-based images. Separate calibrations are provided for the two bulge types, whose virial coefficients differ by a factor of :…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
