Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters
Adrian Ayala (Universidad de Granada, Spain), Inma Dominguez, (Universidad de Granada, Spain), Maurizio Giannotti (Barry Univ., Florida,, USA), Alessandro Mirizzi (Hamburg Univ., Germany), Oscar Straniero (INAF,, Osservatorio Astronomico di Collurania, Teramo, Italy)

TL;DR
This paper establishes a new, stronger upper limit on the axion-photon coupling by analyzing globular cluster star populations and accounting for helium abundance uncertainties, improving previous constraints.
Contribution
The study provides the most stringent bound on axion-photon coupling from globular clusters by incorporating recent helium abundance measurements and stellar modeling.
Findings
Upper bound on $g_{a heta}$: < 0.66×10^{-10} GeV^{-1} at 95% CL
Helium abundance significantly affects the axion-photon coupling estimate
Results improve upon previous astrophysical constraints
Abstract
We derive a strong bound on the axion-photon coupling from the analysis of a sample of 39 Galactic Globular Clusters. As recognized long ago, the R parameter, i.e. the number ratio of stars in horizontal over red giant branch of old stellar clusters, would be reduced by the axion production from photon conversions occurring in stellar cores. In this regard we have compared the measured R with state-of-the-art stellar models obtained under different assumptions for . We show that the estimated value of substantially depends on the adopted He mass fraction Y, an effect often neglected in previous investigations. Taking as benchmark for our study the most recent determinations of the He abundance in H II regions with O/H in the same range of the Galactic Globular Clusters, we obtain an upper bound GeV at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
