GTC Spectra of z ~ 2.3 Quasars: Comparison with Local Luminosity Analogues
Jack W. Sulentic, Paola Marziani, Ascensi\'on del Olmo, Deborah, Dultzin, Jaime Perea, and C. Alenka Negrete

TL;DR
This study compares high-redshift and local quasars of similar luminosity using GTC and HST spectra, revealing consistent spectroscopic properties and potential metallicity evolution, suggesting slow evolution of quasar characteristics across cosmic time.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of quasar emission line diagnostics at different redshifts within a narrow luminosity range, highlighting evolutionary metallicity trends.
Findings
CIV profiles are similar at both redshifts, confirming known differences between Population A and B.
Half of the high-redshift quasars show CIV blueshifts, indicating partial evolution.
Lower metallicity at high redshift suggests a possible evolutionary metallicity gradient.
Abstract
[Abridged] Context: The advent of 8-10m class telescopes makes possible for the first time detailed comparison of quasars with similar luminosity and very different redshifts. Aims: A search for z-dependent gradients in line emission diagnostics and derived physical properties by comparing, in a narrow bolometric luminosity range (log L ~ 46.1 +/- 0.4 [\ergss]), some of the most luminous local (z < 0.6) quasars with some of the lowest luminosity sources yet found at redshift z = 2.1 ~ 2.5. Method: Spectra for 22 high z sources were obtained with the 10.4m Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) while the HST (largely FOS) archive provides a low redshift control sample. Comparison is made in the context of the 4D Eigenvector 1 formalism meaning that we divide both source samples into high accreting Population A and low accreting Population B sources. Results: CIV 1549 shows very similar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
