No Evidence for Bardeen-Petterson Alignment in GRMHD Simulations and Semi-Analytic Models of Moderately Thin, Prograde, Tilted Accretion Disks
Viacheslav V. Zhuravlev, Pavel B. Ivanov, P. Chris Fragile, Danilo, Morales Teixeira

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the Bardeen-Petterson alignment occurs in tilted accretion disks around black holes, finding no evidence for it in prograde cases with moderate viscosity through combined numerical simulations and analytic models.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of GRMHD simulations with an analytic twisted disk model, showing the absence of Bardeen-Petterson alignment in prograde disks with moderate viscosity.
Findings
No Bardeen-Petterson alignment observed in prograde disks
Partial alignment occurs when disk rotation opposes black hole spin
Analytic and numerical models show consistent qualitative behavior
Abstract
In this paper we introduce the first results that use data extracted directly from numerical simulations as inputs to the analytic twisted disk model of Zhuravlev & Ivanov. In both numerical and analytic approaches, fully relativistic models of tilted and twisted disks having a moderate effective viscosity around a slowly rotating Kerr black hole are considered. Qualitatively, the analytic model demonstrates the same dynamics as the simulations, although with some quantitative offset. Namely, the GRMHD simulations generally give smaller variations of tilt and twist across the disk. When the black hole and the disk rotate in the same sense, the simulated tilted disk and analytic model show no sign of Bardeen-Petterson alignment, even in the innermost parts of the disk, where the characteristic time for relaxation to a quasi-stationary configuration is of the same order as the computation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
