Climates and clades: biased methods, biased results
Charles C. Davis, Hanno Schaefer, Brad R. Ruhfel, Michael J. Donoghue,, and Erika J. Edwards

TL;DR
This paper critiques a study on climate change impacts on European biodiversity, highlighting potential biases and limitations in their phylogenetic diversity analysis, especially concerning plants.
Contribution
It questions the validity of previous conclusions about clade-specific impacts and overall phylogenetic diversity trends under climate change scenarios.
Findings
Concerns about biases in phylogenetic analyses
Potential misinterpretation of clade-specific extinction risks
Limitations in current methods for assessing phylogenetic diversity
Abstract
Thuiller et al. analyzed the consequences of anticipated climate change on plant, bird, and mammal phylogenetic diversity (PD) across Europe. They concluded that species loss will not be clade specific across the Tree of Life, and that there will not be an overall decline in PD across the whole of Europe. We applaud their attempt to integrate phylogenetic knowledge into scenarios of future extinction but their analyses raise a series of concerns. We focus here on their analyses of plants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research · Climate Change Policy and Economics
