Assessing Technical Performance in Differential Gene Expression Experiments with External Spike-in RNA Control Ratio Mixtures
Sarah A. Munro, Steve P. Lund, P. Scott Pine, Hans Binder,, Djork-Arn\'e Clevert, Ana Conesa, Joaquin Dopazo, Mario Fasold, Sepp, Hochreiter, Huixiao Hong, Nederah Jafari, David P. Kreil, Pawe{\l} P., {\L}abaj, Sheng Li, Yang Liao, Simon Lin, Joseph Meehan, Christopher E., Mason

TL;DR
This paper introduces a standardized set of metrics using external spike-in RNA controls to evaluate and compare the technical performance of differential gene expression experiments across laboratories.
Contribution
It proposes a comprehensive dashboard of metrics for assessing technical performance, including diagnostic power, detection limits, and bias, applicable across different experimental setups.
Findings
Metrics showed consistent diagnostic power across laboratories.
Measurement variability was comparable within the same process.
Different biases were observed with different mRNA enrichment protocols.
Abstract
There is a critical need for standard approaches to assess, report, and compare the technical performance of genome-scale differential gene expression experiments. We assess technical performance with a proposed "standard" dashboard of metrics derived from analysis of external spike-in RNA control ratio mixtures. These control ratio mixtures with defined abundance ratios enable assessment of diagnostic performance of differentially expressed transcript lists, limit of detection of ratio (LODR) estimates, and expression ratio variability and measurement bias. The performance metrics suite is applicable to analysis of a typical experiment, and here we also apply these metrics to evaluate technical performance among laboratories. An interlaboratory study using identical samples shared amongst 12 laboratories with three different measurement processes demonstrated generally consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
