CHSH inequality: Quantum probabilities as classical conditional probabilities
Andrei Khrennikov

TL;DR
This paper shows that quantum probabilities in the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment can be interpreted as classical conditional probabilities when experimental setting randomness is properly included, challenging the traditional view of non-classicality.
Contribution
It introduces a classical probabilistic framework where quantum probabilities are seen as conditional, accounting for experimental setting randomness, thus reconciling quantum data with classical probability theory.
Findings
Quantum probabilities can be modeled as classical conditionals.
Inclusion of setting randomness is crucial for classical interpretation.
The approach does not support hidden variable explanations.
Abstract
The celebrating theorem of A. Fine implies that the CHSH inequality is violated if and only if the joint probability distribution for the quadruples of observables involved the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment does not exist, i.e., it is impossible to use the classical probabilistic model (Kolmogorov, 1933). In this note we demonstrate that, in spite of Fine's theorem, the results of observations in the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment can be described in the classical probabilistic framework. However, the "quantum probabilities" have to be interpreted as conditional probabilities, where conditioning is with respect to fixed experimental settings. Our approach is based on the complete account of randomness involved in the experiment. The crucial point is that randomness of selections of experimental settings has to be taken into account. This approach can be applied to any complex experiment in which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
