Two statements that are equivalent to a conjecture related to the distribution of prime numbers
Germ\'an Paz

TL;DR
This paper establishes equivalences between a conjecture on prime distributions in specific intervals and several well-known prime conjectures, providing new formulations and computational evidence for the conjecture.
Contribution
It introduces novel equivalent statements of a prime distribution conjecture involving explicit functions and intervals, linking it to famous conjectures and providing computational verification.
Findings
Proves the conjecture is equivalent to prime counts in certain intervals being at least one.
Shows the conjecture's equivalence to prime counts in intervals defined by functions of n.
Provides computational plots supporting the conjecture for many n.
Abstract
Let . In [8] we ask the question whether any sequence of consecutive integers greater than and smaller than contains at least one prime number, and we show that this is actually the case for every . In addition, we prove that a positive answer to the previous question for all would imply Legendre's, Brocard's, Andrica's, and Oppermann's conjectures, as well as the assumption that for every there is always a prime number in the interval . Let denote the amount of prime numbers in the interval . Here we show that the conjecture described in [8] is equivalent to the statement that where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Mathematics and Applications
