First measurement of the charge asymmetry in beauty-quark pair production at a hadron collider
R. Aaij, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, A. Affolder, Z. Ajaltouni, S. Akar, J., Albrecht, F. Alessio, M. Alexander, S. Ali, G. Alkhazov, P. Alvarez Cartelle,, A.A. Alves Jr, S. Amato, S. Amerio, Y. Amhis, L. An, L. Anderlini, J., Anderson, R. Andreassen, M. Andreotti, J.E. Andrews

TL;DR
This paper reports the first measurement of the charge asymmetry in beauty-quark pair production at a hadron collider, using LHCb data at 7 TeV, and finds results consistent with the Standard Model predictions.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental measurement of the charge asymmetry in $b\bar{b}$ production at a hadron collider, expanding understanding of heavy quark production asymmetries.
Findings
Measured asymmetries in three invariant mass regions.
Results are consistent with Standard Model predictions.
Uncertainties are quantified for each mass region.
Abstract
The difference in the angular distributions between beauty quarks and antiquarks, referred to as the charge asymmetry, is measured for the first time in pair production at a hadron collider. The data used correspond to an integrated luminosity of 1.0fb collected at 7TeV center-of-mass energy in proton-proton collisions with the LHCb detector. The measurement is performed in three regions of the invariant mass of the system. The results obtained are: \begin{eqnarray} A_{C}^{b\bar{b}}(40 < M_{b\bar{b}} < 75\,\rm{GeV/c^2}) &=& 0.4 \pm 0.4(\rm{stat}) \pm 0.3(\rm{syst})\%\newline A_{C}^{b\bar{b}}(75 < M_{b\bar{b}} < 105\,\rm{GeV/c^2}) &=& 2.0 \pm 0.9(\rm{stat}) \pm 0.6(\rm{syst})\%\newline A_{C}^{b\bar{b}}(M_{b\bar{b}} > 105\,\rm{GeV/c^2}) &=&1.6 \pm 1.7(\rm{stat}) \pm 0.6(\rm{syst})\% \end{eqnarray} where is defined as the asymmetry in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
