The Frobenius anatomy of word meanings II: possessive relative pronouns
Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, Stephen Clark, Bob Coecke

TL;DR
This paper extends the categorical compositional distributional model to interpret possessive relative pronouns like 'whose', using Frobenius algebras, and connects it to Montague semantics with preliminary corpus-based evidence.
Contribution
It introduces a semantic interpretation for 'whose' within the categorical model, linking algebraic structures to linguistic meaning and providing a concrete vector space implementation.
Findings
Semantic interpretation of 'whose' in categorical model
Connection to Montague semantics and truth theory
Preliminary corpus-based experimental results
Abstract
Within the categorical compositional distributional model of meaning, we provide semantic interpretations for the subject and object roles of the possessive relative pronoun `whose'. This is done in terms of Frobenius algebras over compact closed categories. These algebras and their diagrammatic language expose how meanings of words in relative clauses interact with each other. We show how our interpretation is related to Montague-style semantics and provide a truth-theoretic interpretation. We also show how vector spaces provide a concrete interpretation and provide preliminary corpus-based experimental evidence. In a prequel to this paper, we used similar methods and dealt with the case of subject and object relative pronouns.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
