A comparison of the morphological properties between local and z~1 infrared luminous galaxies. Are local and high-z (U)LIRGs different?
Chao-Ling Hung (1,2), D. B. Sanders (1), Caitlin M. Casey (3), Michael, Koss (4), Kirsten L. Larson (1), Nicholas Lee (1), Yanxia Li (1), Kelly, Lockhart (1), Hsin-Yi Shih (1), Joshua E. Barnes (1), Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, (5), Howard A. Smith (2) ((1) IfA Hawaii

TL;DR
This study compares the morphological properties of local and z~1 infrared luminous galaxies to assess if their merger fractions differ significantly, finding minimal evolution in merger activity up to z~1.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of galaxy morphologies between local and high-z (U)LIRGs using consistent classification methods and accounts for observational biases through simulated datasets.
Findings
Merger fraction decreases slightly from local to z<1.
No strong evolution in merger fraction up to z~1.
High-z (U)LIRGs have uncertain morphology classifications due to faintness.
Abstract
Ultraluminous and luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs and LIRGs) are the most extreme star-forming galaxies in the universe, and dominate the total star formation rate density at z>1. In the local universe (z<0.3), the majority of ULIRGs and a significant portion of LIRGs are triggered by interactions between gas-rich spiral galaxies, yet it is unclear if this is still the case at high-z. To investigate the relative importance of galaxy interactions in infrared luminous galaxies, we carry out a comparison of optical morphological properties between local (U)LIRGs and (U)LIRGs at z=0.5-1.5 based on the same sample selection, morphology classification scheme, and optical morphology at similar rest-frame wavelengths. In addition, we quantify the systematics in comparing local and high-z datasets by constructing a redshifted dataset from local (U)LIRGs, in which its data quality mimics the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
