A spectroscopic and photometric study of the planetary nebulae Kn 61 and Pa 5
Ma. T. Garc\'ia-D\'iaz, D. Gonz\'alez-Buitrago, J. A. L\'opez, S., Zharikov, G. Tovmassian, N. Borisov, G. Valyavin

TL;DR
This study provides the first detailed morpho-kinematical analysis of planetary nebulae Kn 61 and Pa 5, revealing their structures, kinematics, and central star characteristics, including potential binary presence and hydrogen deficiency.
Contribution
It offers the first morpho-kinematical analysis of Kn 61 and Pa 5, identifying their structures, kinematics, and central star properties, including a possible binary system and hydrogen deficiency.
Findings
Kn 61 is a spherical shell expanding at 67.6 km/s with a kinematic age of ~16,000 years.
Pa 5 has an equatorial toroid expanding at 45.2 km/s with faint polar extensions.
Kn 61's central star is a hydrogen-deficient PG 1159-type star.
Abstract
We present the first morpho-kinematical analysis of the planetary nebulae Kn 61 and Pa 5 and explore the nature of their central stars. Our analysis is based on high resolution and medium resolution spectroscopic observations, deep narrow-band imaging, and integral photometry. This material allows us to identify the morphological components and study their kinematics. The direct images and spectra indicate an absence of the characteristic [N II] and [S II] emission lines in both nebulae. The nebular spectrum of Kn 61 suggests an hydrogen deficient planetary nebula and the stellar spectrum of the central star reveals a hydrogen deficient PG 1159-type star. The [O III] position velocity diagram reveals that Kn 61 is a closed, empty, spherical shell with a thin border and a filamentary surface expanding at 67.6 km s, and the shell is currently not expanding isotropically. We derived…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
