Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
C. S\'anchez, M. Carrasco Kind, H. Lin, R. Miquel, F. B. Abdalla, A., Amara, M. Banerji, C. Bonnett, R. Brunner, D. Capozzi, A. Carnero, F. J., Castander, L. A. N. da Costa, C. Cunha, A. Fausti, D. Gerdes, N. Greisel, J., Gschwend, W. Hartley, S. Jouvel, O. Lahav, M. Lima

TL;DR
This study evaluates the photometric redshift accuracy of the Dark Energy Survey using early data, demonstrating that most photo-z methods meet the survey's performance requirements with core resolution around 0.08.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of various photo-z algorithms on DES SV data, highlighting the effectiveness of empirical methods like neural networks and random forests.
Findings
Empirical photo-z methods achieve core resolution of ~0.08.
Most photo-z codes meet DES performance requirements.
The weighting method effectively mimics full survey conditions.
Abstract
We present results from a study of the photometric redshift performance of the Dark Energy Survey (DES), using the early data from a Science Verification (SV) period of observations in late 2012 and early 2013 that provided science-quality images for almost 200 sq.~deg.~at the nominal depth of the survey. We assess the photometric redshift performance using about 15000 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts available from other surveys. These galaxies are used, in different configurations, as a calibration sample, and photo-'s are obtained and studied using most of the existing photo- codes. A weighting method in a multi-dimensional color-magnitude space is applied to the spectroscopic sample in order to evaluate the photo- performance with sets that mimic the full DES photometric sample, which is on average significantly deeper than the calibration sample due to the limited…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
