Invention as a Combinatorial Process: Evidence from U.S. Patents
Hyejin Youn, Luis M. A. Bettencourt, Deborah Strumsky, Jose Lobo

TL;DR
This paper analyzes U.S. patent data from 1790 to 2010 to quantitatively characterize invention as a combinatorial process, revealing invariant rates of technological exploration and exploitation despite slow growth in new technologies.
Contribution
It provides a formal, data-driven framework to understand invention as a combinatorial process, highlighting invariant dynamics and the vast potential of technological combinations.
Findings
Invariant rate of technological exploration and exploitation.
Slowdown in the creation of new technological building blocks.
Nearly infinite space of technological configurations from combinatorial innovation.
Abstract
Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here we utilize U.S. patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize the invention as a combinatorial process. To do this we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the U.S. Patent Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of "exploitation" (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and "exploration" (the development of new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
