A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies
Diana Battefeld, Patrick Peter

TL;DR
This review critically assesses bouncing cosmologies as alternatives to inflation, highlighting their theoretical challenges, compatibility with observational data, and promising models that merit further investigation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive critique of bouncing models, discusses their problems, and evaluates their fit with current cosmological observations, offering guidance for future research.
Findings
Most bouncing models predict a blue spectrum needing fine-tuning
Many models produce large non-Gaussianities
Some proposals can violate NEC without instabilities
Abstract
Given the proliferation of bouncing models in recent years, we gather and critically assess these proposals in a comprehensive review. The Planck data shows an unmistakably red, quasi scale-invariant, purely adiabatic primordial power spectrum and no primary non-Gaussianities. While these observations are consistent with inflationary predictions, bouncing cosmologies aspire to provide an alternative framework to explain them. Such models face many problems, both of the purely theoretical kind, such as the necessity of violating the NEC and instabilities, and at the cosmological application level, as exemplified by the possible presence of shear. We provide a pedagogical introduction to these problems and also assess the fitness of different proposals with respect to the data. For example, many models predict a slightly blue spectrum and must be fine-tuned to generate a red spectral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
