Relativistic redshifts in quasar broad lines
Scott Tremaine (1), Yue Shen (2), Xin Liu (3), Abraham Loeb (4) ((1), Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, (2) Carnegie Observatories, (3), University of California, Los Angeles, (4) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for, Astrophysics)

TL;DR
This study analyzes relativistic effects on broad emission lines in quasars, finding that line profiles are consistent with emission from a Keplerian disk viewed at certain inclinations, impacting our understanding of quasar dynamics.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale observational evidence linking relativistic redshifts in quasar broad lines to a Keplerian disk model with specific inclination limits.
Findings
Redshift variations match relativistic predictions for a Keplerian disk.
Line-of-sight inflow/outflow velocities are much less than Keplerian velocities.
Results support simple AGN unification models.
Abstract
The broad emission lines commonly seen in quasar spectra have velocity widths of a few per cent of the speed of light, so special- and general-relativistic effects have a significant influence on the line profile. We have determined the redshift of the broad H-beta line in the quasar rest frame (determined from the core component of the [OIII] line) for over 20,000 quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 quasar catalog. The mean redshift as a function of line width is approximately consistent with the relativistic redshift that is expected if the line originates in a randomly oriented Keplerian disk that is obscured when the inclination of the disk to the line of sight exceeds ~30-45 degrees, consistent with simple AGN unification schemes. This result also implies that the net line-of-sight inflow/outflow velocities in the broad-line region are much less than the Keplerian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
