Efficiency of message transmission using biased random walks in complex networks in the presence of traps
Loukas Skarpalezos, Aristotelis Kittas, Panos Argyrakis, Reuven Cohen,, Shlomo Havlin

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how biased random walks can efficiently transmit messages in complex networks with traps, identifying conditions under which transmission success remains high despite trap presence.
Contribution
It provides an analytical framework linking bias, trap concentration, and network type to transmission efficiency, including explicit formulas for different network models.
Findings
Transmission success inversely proportional to trap concentration and network size for unbiased walks.
A threshold trap concentration exists below which transmission efficiency is unaffected by traps.
Higher bias improves transmission success, especially in scale-free networks with traps on high-degree nodes.
Abstract
We study the problem of a particle/message that travels as a biased random walk towards a target node in a network in the presence of traps. The bias is represented as the probability of the particle to travel along the shortest path to the target node. The efficiency of the transmission process is expressed through the fraction of particles that succeed to reach the target without being trapped. By relating with the number of nodes visited before reaching the target, we firstly show that, for the unbiased random walk, is inversely proportional to both the concentration of traps and the size of the network. For the case of biased walks, a simple approximation of provides an analytical solution that describes well the behavior of , especially for . Also, it is shown that for a given value of the bias , when the concentration of traps…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
