Conjunction and Negation of Natural Concepts: A Quantum-theoretic Modeling
Sandro Sozzo

TL;DR
This paper investigates how negation affects concept combination using experiments and demonstrates that quantum probability models can accurately describe non-classical effects like vagueness and overextension in human categorization.
Contribution
It introduces a quantum-theoretic model for conceptual combination involving negation, explaining deviations from classical logic observed in experimental data.
Findings
Quantum model fits experimental data on concept conjunctions and negations
Classical logic fails to account for observed conceptual vagueness
Quantum effects like interference explain non-classical membership patterns
Abstract
We perform two experiments with the aim to investigate the effects of negation on the combination of natural concepts. In the first experiment, we test the membership weights of a list of exemplars with respect to two concepts, e.g., {\it Fruits} and {\it Vegetables}, and their conjunction {\it Fruits And Vegetables}. In the second experiment, we test the membership weights of the same list of exemplars with respect to the same two concepts, but negating the second, e.g., {\it Fruits} and {\it Not Vegetables}, and again their conjunction {\it Fruits And Not Vegetables}. The collected data confirm existing results on conceptual combination, namely, they show dramatic deviations from the predictions of classical (fuzzy set) logic and probability theory. More precisely, they exhibit conceptual vagueness, gradeness of membership, overextension and double overextension of membership weights…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
