Quintessence in a quandary: prior dependence in dark energy models
David J. E. Marsh, Philip Bull, Pedro G. Ferreira, Andrew Pontzen

TL;DR
This paper investigates how quintessence dark energy models impose specific priors on the equation of state parameters, influencing survey strategies and the expected information gain from future observations.
Contribution
It characterizes the prior constraints of quintessence models on dark energy parameters and assesses their impact on survey design and information gain calculations.
Findings
Quintessence models restrict the (w0, wa) parameter space.
A natural scale in the (w0, wa) plane distinguishes quintessence.
Future galaxy surveys will meet the FOM > 200 requirement.
Abstract
The archetypal theory of dark energy is quintessence: a minimally coupled scalar field with a canonical kinetic energy and potential. By studying random potentials we show that quintessence imposes a restricted set of priors on the equation of state of dark energy. Focusing on the commonly-used parametrisation, , we show that there is a natural scale and direction in the plane that distinguishes quintessence as a general framework. We calculate the expected information gain for a given survey and show that, because of the non-trivial prior information, it is a function of more than just the figure of merit. This allows us to make a quantitative case for novel survey strategies. We show that the scale of the prior sets target observational requirements for gaining significant information. This corresponds to a figure of merit FOM, a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
