Torsion, Magnetic Monopoles and Faraday's Law via a Variational Principle

TL;DR

This paper introduces a variational principle framework that unifies Faraday's Law, magnetic monopoles, and torsion in spacetime, suggesting monopoles could be Grassmann-valued and explaining their non-detection.

Contribution

It develops a novel variational approach linking torsion, magnetic monopoles, and Faraday's Law, allowing monopoles to be Grassmann-valued and integrating these concepts into geometric frameworks.

Findings

Faraday's Law derived as a stationarity condition via axial vector variation.

Magnetic monopoles introduced without singularities or topology changes.

Torsion and monopoles can be Grassmann-valued, potentially explaining their non-detection.

Abstract

Even though Faraday's Law is a dynamical law that describes how changing $\bf{E}$ and $\bf {B}$ fields influence each other, by introducing a vector potential $A_{\mu}$ according to $F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$ Faraday's Law is satisfied kinematically, with the relation $(-g)^{-1/2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\sigma\tau}\nabla_{\nu}F_{\sigma\tau}=0$ holding on every path in a variational procedure or path integral. In a space with torsion $Q_{\alpha\beta\gamma}$ the axial vector $S^{\mu}=(-g)^{1/2}\epsilon^{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma}Q_{\alpha\beta\gamma}$ serves as a chiral analog of $A_{\mu}$, and via variation with respect to $S_{\mu}$ one can derive Faraday's Law dynamically as a stationarity condition. With $S_{\mu}$ serving as an axial potential one is able to introduce magnetic monopoles without $S_{\mu}$ needing to be singular or have a non-trivial topology. Our analysis permits torsion and magnetic monopoles to be intrinsically Grassmann, which could explain why they have never been detected. Our procedure permits us to both construct a Weyl geometry in which $A_{\mu}$ is metricated and then convert it into a standard Riemannian geometry.