The validity of quasi steady-state approximations in discrete stochastic simulations

TL;DR

This paper investigates the conditions under which the stochastic quasi-steady state approximation (QSSA) accurately models biochemical networks, revealing that sensitivity of reaction rate functions, not just timescale separation, determines validity.

Contribution

It introduces a new criterion based on sensitivity analysis for the validity of stochastic QSSA, showing total QSSA yields more accurate approximations than standard methods.

Findings

Stochastic QSSA accuracy depends on sensitivity of reaction functions.

Total QSSA produces less sensitive, more accurate functions.

Validity of stochastic QSSA is not solely based on timescale separation.

Abstract

In biochemical networks, reactions often occur on disparate timescales and can be characterized as either "fast" or "slow." The quasi-steady state approximation (QSSA) utilizes timescale separation to project models of biochemical networks onto lower-dimensional slow manifolds. As a result, fast elementary reactions are not modeled explicitly, and their effect is captured by non-elementary reaction rate functions (e.g. Hill functions). The accuracy of the QSSA applied to deterministic systems depends on how well timescales are separated. Recently, it has been proposed to use the non-elementary rate functions obtained via the deterministic QSSA to define propensity functions in stochastic simulations of biochemical networks. In this approach, termed the stochastic QSSA, fast reactions that are part of non-elementary reactions are not simulated, greatly reducing computation time. However, it is unclear when the stochastic QSSA provides an accurate approximation of the original stochastic simulation. We show that, unlike the deterministic QSSA, the validity of the stochastic QSSA does not follow from timescale separation alone, but also depends on the sensitivity of the non-elementary reaction rate functions to changes in the slow species. The stochastic QSSA becomes more accurate when this sensitivity is small. Different types of QSSAs result in non-elementary functions with different sensitivities, and the total QSSA results in less sensitive functions than the standard or the pre-factor QSSA. We prove that, as a result, the stochastic QSSA becomes more accurate when non-elementary reaction functions are obtained using the total QSSA. Our work provides a novel condition for the validity of the QSSA in stochastic simulations of biochemical reaction networks with disparate timescales.