Measurements of Observables Replaced by "Detections" in Quantum Theory
Giuseppe Nistic\`o, Angela Sestito

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the distinction between measurements and detections in quantum physics, emphasizing that detections infer observable values without equating them to direct measurements, and explores their conceptual implications.
Contribution
It rigorously proves that detections are not equivalent to measurements in quantum theory and clarifies their conceptual role within the framework.
Findings
Detections are inferential, not direct measurements.
Measurements and detections have fundamentally different meanings in quantum physics.
The paper establishes the conceptual boundaries of detections in quantum theory.
Abstract
In Quantum Physics it is not always possible to directly perform the measurement of an obsevable; in some of these cases, however, its value can be {\sl detected}, i.e. it can be inferred by measuring {\sl another} observable characterized by perfect correlation with the observable of interest. Though a {\sl detection} is often interpreted as a {\sl measurement} of the detected observable, we prove that the two concepts cannot be identified in Quantum Physics. Furthermore, we establish what meaning and role can be ascribed to detections coherently with Quantum Theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
