The chemistry of planet-forming regions is not interstellar
Klaus M. Pontoppidan, Sandra M. Blevins

TL;DR
This study uses a two-dimensional radiative transfer model to analyze the molecular composition of a protoplanetary disk, revealing that inner disk chemistry significantly differs from prestellar cloud chemistry, especially in CO₂ abundance.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed radiative transfer model for RNO 90 to compare disk chemistry with dense cloud chemistry, highlighting fundamental differences.
Findings
Inner disk chemistry differs from prestellar chemistry.
CO₂ concentration is much lower in disks than in dense clouds.
The model provides molecular concentration estimates for the terrestrial region.
Abstract
Advances in infrared and submillimeter technology have allowed for detailed observations of the molecular content of the planet-forming regions of protoplanetary disks. In particular, disks around solar-type stars now have growing molecular inventories that can be directly compared with both prestellar chemistry and that inferred for the early solar nebula. The data directly address the old question whether the chemistry of planet-forming matter is similar or different and unique relative to the chemistry of dense clouds and protostellar envelopes. The answer to this question may have profound consequences for the structure and composition of planetary systems. The practical challenge is that observations of emission lines from disks do not easily translate into chemical concentrations. Here, we present a two-dimensional radiative transfer model of RNO 90, a classical protoplanetary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
