The ontology of Bohmian mechanics
Michael Esfeld, Dustin Lazarovici, Mario Hubert, Detlef D\"urr

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the ontology of Bohmian mechanics, emphasizing its focus on particles and laws of motion, and explores philosophical foundations like Humeanism and dispositionalism for grounding these laws.
Contribution
It offers a novel interpretation of Bohmian mechanics as committed only to particles and laws, avoiding the need for a physical wave-function as a fundamental entity.
Findings
Bohmian mechanics can be formulated without a physical wave-function.
Humeanism and dispositionalism provide different grounding options for the law of motion.
The approach clarifies the primitive ontology in quantum mechanics.
Abstract
The paper points out that the modern formulation of Bohm's quantum theory known as Bohmian mechanics is committed only to particles' positions and a law of motion. We explain how this view can avoid the open questions that the traditional view faces according to which Bohm's theory is committed to a wave-function that is a physical entity over and above the particles, although it is defined on configuration space instead of three-dimensional space. We then enquire into the status of the law of motion, elaborating on how the main philosophical options to ground a law of motion, namely Humeanism and dispositionalism, can be applied to Bohmian mechanics. In conclusion, we sketch out how these options apply to primitive ontology approaches to quantum mechanics in general.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
