Effect of rotational mixing and metallicity on the hot star wind mass-loss rates
Jiri Krticka, Jiri Kubat

TL;DR
This study investigates how rotational mixing and metallicity influence the mass-loss rates of hot star winds, revealing that at low metallicities, chemical composition changes significantly impact wind properties and the wind momentum-luminosity relationship.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the effects of CNO-processed chemical compositions on stellar wind mass-loss rates across different metallicities using NLTE wind modeling.
Findings
At high metallicity ($Z/Z_\odot \gtrsim 0.1$), composition changes do not significantly alter mass-loss rates.
At low metallicity ($Z/Z_\odot \lesssim 0.1$), rotational mixing greatly affects wind mass-loss rates.
The wind momentum-luminosity relationship becomes unreliable at very low metallicities due to increased scatter.
Abstract
Hot star wind mass-loss rates depend on the abundance of individual elements. This dependence is usually accounted for assuming scaled solar chemical composition. However, this approach may not be justified in evolved rotating stars. The rotational mixing brings CNO-processed material to the stellar surface, increasing the abundance of nitrogen at the expense of carbon and oxygen, which potentially influences the mass-loss rates. We study the influence of the modified chemical composition resulting from the rotational mixing on the wind parameters, particularly the wind mass-loss rates. We use our NLTE wind code to predict the wind structure and compare the calculated wind mass-loss rate for the case of scaled solar chemical composition and the composition affected by the CNO cycle. We show that for a higher mass-fraction of heavier elements the change of chemical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
