The Sizes of Candidate $z\sim9-10$ Galaxies: confirmation of the bright CANDELS sample and relation with luminosity and mass
Benne W. Holwerda (Leiden Observatory), Rychard Bouwens (Leiden, Observatory), Pascal Oesch (Yale), Renske Smit (Leiden Observatory), Garth, Illingworth (UCO/Lick), and Ivo Labbe (Leiden Observatory)

TL;DR
This study measures the sizes of candidate galaxies at redshift 9-10, confirming their small sizes and using this data to explore galaxy size evolution, luminosity, and mass relations at these early cosmic times.
Contribution
The paper provides the first size measurements of luminous $z\sim9-10$ galaxy candidates and extends the size evolution analysis to these redshifts, confirming the size-luminosity and size-mass relations.
Findings
Mean size of 0.13" at $z\sim9-10$ matches extrapolated lower-redshift sizes.
Size constraints help distinguish high-redshift galaxies from contaminants.
Size evolution follows a $(1+z)^{-1.0 ext{±}0.1}$ trend from $z=4$ to $z=10$.
Abstract
Recently, a small sample of six candidates was discovered in CANDELS that are more luminous than any of the previous galaxies identified over the HUDF/XDF and CLASH fields. We measure the sizes of these candidates to map out the size evolution of galaxies from the earliest observable times. Their sizes are also used to provide a valuable constraint on whether these unusual galaxy candidates are at high redshift. Using galfit to derive sizes from the CANDELS F160W images of these candidates, we find a mean size of 0.130.02" (or 0.50.1 kpc at ). This handsomely matches the 0.6 kpc size expected extrapolating lower redshift measurements to , while being much smaller than the 0.59" mean size for lower-redshift interlopers to photometric selections lacking the blue IRAC color criterion. This suggests that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
