W-like states are not Necessary for Totally Correct Quantum Anonymous Leader Election
Alexander Norton

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that W-like entangled states are not essential for achieving totally correct quantum anonymous leader election, broadening the understanding of quantum resources in distributed algorithms.
Contribution
It introduces a new symmetric quantum state different from W states and constructs a leader election protocol using it, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
W-like states are not necessary for quantum leader election
A new symmetric quantum state enables leader election
The protocol is totally correct and anonymous
Abstract
I show that W-like entangled quantum states are not a necessary quantum resource for totally correct anonymous leader election protocols. This is proven by defining a symmetric quantum state that is n-partite SLOCC inequivalent to the W state, and then constructing a totally correct anonymous leader election protocol using this state. This result, which contradicts the previous necessity result of D'Hondt and Panangaden, furthers our understanding of how non-local quantum states can be used as a resource for distributed computation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
