The smallest sets of points not determined by their X-rays
Andreas Alpers, David G. Larman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the minimal size of point sets in Euclidean and integer spaces that are indistinguishable by their X-ray projections in multiple directions, providing new polynomial bounds and implications for classical number theory problems.
Contribution
The authors establish the first polynomial upper bounds on the size of point sets with identical X-rays in multiple directions in higher dimensions, extending previous exponential bounds.
Findings
Proved $oxed{ ext{ $ ext{O}(m^{d+1+ ext{ε}})$}}$ bounds for $oxed{ ext{ $ ext{ψ}_{ extbf{K}^d}(m)$}}$ in higher dimensions.
Derived bounds on solutions to the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem.
Established lower bounds leading to a strengthened Rényi's theorem for integer lattice points.
Abstract
Let be an -point set in with and . A (discrete) X-ray of in direction gives the number of points of on each line parallel to . We define as the minimum number for which there exist directions (pairwise linearly independent and spanning ) such that two -point sets in exist that have the same X-rays in these directions. The bound has been observed many times in the literature. In this note we show for . For the cases and , , this represents the first upper bound on that is polynomial in . As a corollary we derive bounds on the sizes of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
