Simulations of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays propagation
O. E. Kalashev, E. Kido

TL;DR
This paper compares Monte Carlo and transport equation methods for simulating Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays, finding they produce similar results with the transport method being significantly faster.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison between two simulation techniques for UHECR propagation, highlighting the efficiency of the transport equation approach.
Findings
Transport method is ~100 times faster than Monte Carlo.
Both methods yield practically identical results for proton/neutron primaries.
CRPropa and TransportCR codes are compatible with accuracy improvements.
Abstract
We compare two techniques for simulation of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR) propagation, the Monte Carlo approach and method based on solving transport equations in one dimension. For the former we adopt publicly available tool CRPropa and for the later we use the code TransportCR developed by O.K. et al. and used in number of applications which is made available online with publishing this paper. While the CRPropa code is more universal, transport equation solver has advantage of roughly 100 times higher calculation speed. We conclude that the methods give practically identical results for the case of proton or neutron primaries provided that some accuracy improvements are introduced to CRPropa code.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
