Evolution of Thermally Pulsing Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars IV. Constraining Mass-Loss & Lifetimes of Low Mass, Low Metallicity AGB Stars
Philip Rosenfield, Paola Marigo, Leo Girardi, Julianne J. Dalcanton,, Alessandro Bressan, Marco Gullieuszik, Daniel Weisz, Benjamin F. Williams,, Andrew Dolphin, Bernhard Aringer

TL;DR
This study constrains the mass-loss processes and lifetimes of low-mass, low-metallicity TP-AGB stars by comparing models with observations in six galaxies, highlighting the importance of pre-dust mass-loss.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on TP-AGB star lifetimes and mass-loss prescriptions at low metallicity, improving stellar evolution models.
Findings
Pre-dust mass-loss is crucial for matching observations.
Low-mass TP-AGB stars have lifetimes around 0.5 Myr.
Higher mass TP-AGB stars have lifetimes up to 1.2 Myr.
Abstract
The evolution and lifetimes of thermally pulsating asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars suffer from significant uncertainties. In this work, we analyze the numbers and luminosity functions of TP-AGB stars in six quiescent, low metallicity ([Fe/H] ) galaxies taken from the ANGST sample, using HST photometry in both optical and near-infrared filters. The galaxies contain over 1000 TP-AGB stars (at least 60 per field). We compare the observed TP-AGB luminosity functions and relative numbers of TP-AGB and RGB stars, to models generated from different suites of TP-AGB evolutionary tracks after adopting star formation histories (SFH) derived from the HST deep optical observations. We test various mass-loss prescriptions that differ in their treatments of mass-loss before the onset of dust-driven winds (pre-dust). These comparisons confirm that pre-dust mass-loss is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
