Conjectures on stably Newton degenerate singularities
Jan Stevens

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether all functions can be made non-degenerate via stabilization, concluding that some singularities remain stably degenerate, especially in finite characteristic, challenging a conjecture by Arnold.
Contribution
It introduces a method to attempt non-degeneracy through stabilization and provides examples where this method fails, supporting the conjecture of stable degeneracy for certain singularities.
Findings
Some singularities cannot be made non-degenerate after stabilization.
Finite characteristic singularities like $x^p+x^q$ are stably degenerate.
Irreducible plane curves with multiple Puiseux pairs are stably non-degenerate.
Abstract
We discuss a problem of Arnold, whether every function is stably equivalent to one which is non-degenerate for its Newton diagram. We argue that the answer is negative. We describe a method to make functions non-degenerate after stabilisation and give examples of singularities where this method does not work. We conjecture that they are in fact stably degenerate, that is not stably equivalent to non-degenerate functions. We review the various non-degeneracy concepts in the literature. For finite characteristic we conjecture that there are nowild vanishing cycles for non-degenerate singularities. This implies that the simplest example of singularities with finite Milnor number, in characteristic , is not stably equivalent to a non-degenerate function. We argue that irreducible plane curves with an arbitrary number of Puiseux pairs (in characteristic zero) are stably…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
