Protocol choice and parameter optimization in decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution
Feihu Xu, He Xu, Hoi-Kwong Lo

TL;DR
This paper compares decoy-state methods in MDI-QKD, showing two decoy states are nearly optimal, and demonstrates that full system parameter optimization significantly enhances key rate, with a fast local search method proposed.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of decoy-state protocols and introduces an efficient local search method for parameter optimization in MDI-QKD.
Findings
Two decoy states suffice for near-optimal key rate.
Full parameter optimization can increase key rate by over ten times.
A fast local search method outperforms exhaustive search in speed.
Abstract
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) has been demonstrated in both laboratories and field-tests using attenuated lasers combined with the decoy-state technique. Although researchers have studied various decoy-state MDI-QKD protocols with two or three decoy states, a clear comparison between these protocols is still missing. This invokes the question of how many types of decoy states are needed for practical MDI-QKD. Moreover, the system parameters to implement decoy-state MDI-QKD are only partially optimized in all previous works, which casts doubt on the actual performance of former demonstrations. Here, we present analytical and numerical decoy-state methods with one, two and three decoy states. We provide a clear comparison among these methods and find that two decoy states already enable a near optimal estimation and more decoy states cannot improve the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
