Comparing and Combining Sentiment Analysis Methods
Pollyanna Gon\c{c}alves, Matheus Ara\'ujo, Fabr\'icio Benevenuto, and Meeyoung Cha

TL;DR
This paper compares eight popular sentiment analysis methods in social media, introduces a new combined approach with improved coverage, and provides a web service for method comparison.
Contribution
It offers a systematic comparison of sentiment analysis methods, introduces a novel combination approach, and provides an accessible web API for analysis and comparison.
Findings
The new combined method achieves the highest coverage.
The comparison reveals strengths and weaknesses of existing methods.
The iFeel web service enables easy access to multiple sentiment analysis results.
Abstract
Several messages express opinions about events, products, and services, political views or even their author's emotional state and mood. Sentiment analysis has been used in several applications including analysis of the repercussions of events in social networks, analysis of opinions about products and services, and simply to better understand aspects of social communication in Online Social Networks (OSNs). There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based approaches and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the wide use and popularity of some methods, it is unclear which method is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message as the current literature does not provide a method of comparison among existing methods. Such a comparison is crucial for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
