Indicators of Tambara-Yamagami categories and Gauss sums
Tathagata Basak, Ryan Johnson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that higher Frobenius-Schur indicators, computed via quadratic Gauss sums, can uniquely identify Tambara-Yamagami categories for groups of non-2-power order, extending previous results and providing new invariants.
Contribution
It establishes that higher Frobenius-Schur indicators distinguish Tambara-Yamagami categories based on group order, extending classification results to groups with even order.
Findings
Higher indicators distinguish Tambara-Yamagami categories.
State-sum invariants determine categories for groups not of 2-power order.
Counterexample shows limitations for groups with 2-power order.
Abstract
We prove that the higher Frobenius-Schur indicators, introduced by Ng and Schauenburg, give a strong enough invariant to distinguish between any two Tambara-Yamagami fusion categories. Our proofs are based on computation of the higher indicators as quadratic Gauss sums for certain quadratic forms on finite abelian groups and relies on the classification of quadratic forms on finite abelian groups, due to Wall. As a corollary to our work, we show that the state-sum invariants of a Tambara-Yamagami category determine the category as long as we restrict to Tambara-Yamagami categories coming from groups G whose order is not a power of 2. Turaev and Vainerman proved this result under the assumption that G has odd order and they conjectured that a similar result should hold for groups of even order. We also give an example to show that the assumption that G does not have a power of 2,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
