The Kepler-10 planetary system revisited by HARPS-N: A hot rocky world and a solid Neptune-mass planet
Xavier Dumusque, Aldo S. Bonomo, Raphaelle D. Haywood, Luca Malavolta,, Damien Segransan, Lars A. Buchhave, Andrew Collier Cameron, David W. Latham,, Emilio Molinari, Francesco Pepe, Stephane Udry, David Charbonneau, Rosario, Cosentino, Courtney D. Dressing, Pedro Figueira

TL;DR
This study refines the mass and density measurements of Kepler-10b and Kepler-10c using extensive HARPS-N radial velocity data, revealing their compositions and suggesting Kepler-10c as a solid, Neptune-mass planet with a longer orbital period.
Contribution
The paper provides improved mass and density estimates for Kepler-10b and Kepler-10c, demonstrating Kepler-10c as a solid Neptune-mass planet with a longer period, based on new HARPS-N observations.
Findings
Kepler-10b has a mass of 3.33 +/- 0.49 Mearth and density of 5.8 +/- 0.8 g/cm^3.
Kepler-10c has a mass of 17.2 +/- 1.9 Mearth and density of 7.1 +/- 1.0 g/cm^3.
Kepler-10c is the first strong evidence of a more massive solid planet with a longer orbital period.
Abstract
Kepler-10b was the first rocky planet detected by the Kepler satellite and con- firmed with radial velocity follow-up observations from Keck-HIRES. The mass of the planet was measured with a precision of around 30%, which was insufficient to constrain models of its internal structure and composition in detail. In addition to Kepler-10b, a second planet transiting the same star with a period of 45 days was sta- tistically validated, but the radial velocities were only good enough to set an upper limit of 20 Mearth for the mass of Kepler-10c. To improve the precision on the mass for planet b, the HARPS-N Collaboration decided to observe Kepler-10 intensively with the HARPS-N spectrograph on the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo on La Palma. In to- tal, 148 high-quality radial-velocity measurements were obtained over two observing seasons. These new data allow us to improve the precision of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
