CLASH-X: A Comparison of Lensing and X-ray Techniques for Measuring the Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters
Megan Donahue, G. Mark Voit, Andisheh Mahdavi, Keiichi Umetsu, Stefano, Ettori, Julian Merten, Marc Postman, Aaron Hoffer, Alessandro Baldi, Dan Coe,, Nicole Czakon, Mattias Bartelmann, Narciso Benitez, Rychard Bouwens, Larry, Bradley, Tom Broadhurst, Holland Ford

TL;DR
This study compares X-ray and gravitational lensing techniques for measuring galaxy cluster mass profiles, highlighting systematic differences and potential proxies for total mass, with implications for cosmology.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of X-ray and lensing mass measurements in galaxy clusters, identifying systematic biases and proposing gas mass profiles as proxies for total mass.
Findings
X-ray temperature measurements differ between XMM and Chandra at large radii.
Lensing and X-ray mass profiles show systematic biases and radial dependencies.
Gas mass profiles are consistent proxies for total mass beyond 0.5 Mpc.
Abstract
We present profiles of temperature (Tx), gas mass, and hydrostatic mass estimated from new and archival X-ray observations of CLASH clusters. We compare measurements derived from XMM and Chandra observations with one another and compare both to gravitational lensing mass profiles derived with CLASH HST and ground-based lensing data. Radial profiles of Chandra and XMM electron density and enclosed gas mass are nearly identical, indicating that differences in hydrostatic masses inferred from X-ray observations arise from differences in Tx measurements. Encouragingly, cluster Txs are consistent with one another at ~100-200 kpc radii but XMM Tx systematically decline relative to Chandra Tx at larger radii. The angular dependence of the discrepancy suggests additional investigation on systematics such as the XMM point spread function correction, vignetting and off-axis responses. We present…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
