What is the distance to the CMB?
Chris Clarkson, Obinna Umeh, Roy Maartens, Ruth Durrer

TL;DR
This paper investigates a subtle relativistic effect that causes a systematic shift in the CMB distance-redshift relation, which could bias cosmological parameter estimates if neglected, highlighting the importance of precise background modeling.
Contribution
It derives the relativistic shift in the CMB distance using second-order perturbations and discusses its implications for cosmological parameter estimation.
Findings
The distance to last scattering increases by about 1%.
Neglecting the shift could bias H0 estimates by around 5%.
Accurate background modeling is essential for sub-percent precision in cosmology.
Abstract
The success of precision cosmology depends not only on accurate observations, but also on the theoretical model - which must be understood to at least the same level of precision. Subtle relativistic effects can lead to biased measurements if they are neglected. One such effect gives a systematic shift in the distance-redshift relation away from its background value, due to the non- linear relativistic conservation of total photon flux. We also show directly how this shift follows from a fully relativistic analysis of the geodesic deviation equation. We derive the expectation value of the shift using second-order perturbations about a concordance background, and show that the distance to last scattering is increased by 1%. We argue that neglecting this shift could lead to a significant bias in the background cosmological parameters, because it alters the meaning of the background model.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
