Robustness of journal rankings by network flows with different amounts of memory
Ludvig Bohlin, Alcides Viamontes Esquivel, Andrea Lancichinetti and, Martin Rosvall

TL;DR
This paper compares the robustness of different network flow-based journal rankings, showing that higher-order Markov models, which incorporate more memory, are more resilient to journal selection biases but require more data.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison of impact factor, Eigenfactor, and higher-order Markov models for journal ranking robustness, highlighting the advantages of incorporating memory in citation flow models.
Findings
Higher-order Markov models are more robust to journal selection.
Second-order models outperform impact factor and Eigenfactor.
Increased robustness requires more citation data over time.
Abstract
As the number of scientific journals has multiplied, journal rankings have become increasingly important for scientific decisions. From submissions and subscriptions to grants and hirings, researchers, policy makers, and funding agencies make important decisions with influence from journal rankings such as the ISI journal impact factor. Typically, the rankings are derived from the citation network between a selection of journals and unavoidably depend on this selection. However, little is known about how robust rankings are to the selection of included journals. Here we compare the robustness of three journal rankings based on network flows induced on citation networks. They model pathways of researchers navigating scholarly literature, stepping between journals and remembering their previous steps to different degree: zero-step memory as impact factor, one-step memory as Eigenfactor,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Game Theory and Applications
