
TL;DR
This paper explores a modified formalization of the Buddhist logical concept catuskoti, demonstrating how slight adjustments can enable its interpretation within classical propositional logic, contrasting with recent many-valued approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a modified formalization of catuskoti that fits within classical propositional calculus, offering an alternative to recent many-valued paraconsistent logic models.
Findings
Modified catuskoti formalization fits classical logic
Provides an alternative to paraconsistent logic models
Enhances understanding of Buddhist logic in modern formal systems
Abstract
The `catuskoti' or tetralemma in Buddhist logic is a problematic subject from the modern logical point of view. Recently a many-valued paraconsistent logic was proposed in order to formalize catuskoti adequately by G. Priest. On the other hand a slight modification of the formalization of catuskoti seems to allow an appropriate interpretation in the framework of the classical propositional calculus in the mathematical logic developed by Russell-Whitehead and Hilbert-Ackermann.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
