Field theory representation of gauge-gravity symmetry-protected topological invariants, group cohomology and beyond
Juven Wang, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Xiao-Gang Wen

TL;DR
This paper develops a continuum field theory framework using gauge fields to represent symmetry twists, enabling the classification and analysis of symmetry-protected topological states, including those beyond group cohomology, across various dimensions.
Contribution
It introduces a gauge field approach to express SPT invariants in continuum theories, capturing both group cohomology and beyond-group-cohomology SPTs, and provides new examples in 4+1D.
Findings
SPT invariants described by pure gauge actions match group cohomology predictions.
Mixed gauge-gravity actions reveal beyond-group-cohomology SPTs, such as in 4+1D.
Application to topological insulators with U(1) and time-reversal symmetries.
Abstract
The challenge of identifying symmetry-protected topological states (SPTs) is due to their lack of symmetry-breaking order parameters and intrinsic topological orders. For this reason, it is impossible to formulate SPTs under Ginzburg-Landau theory or probe SPTs via fractionalized bulk excitations and topology-dependent ground state degeneracy. However, the partition functions from path integrals with various symmetry twists are the universal SPT invariants defining topological probe responses, fully characterizing SPTs. In this work, we use gauge fields to represent those symmetry twists in closed spacetimes of any dimensionality and arbitrary topology. This allows us to express the SPT invariants in terms of continuum field theory. We show that SPT invariants of pure gauge actions describe the SPTs predicted by group cohomology, while the mixed gauge-gravity actions describe the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
