VAR and ES/CVAR Dependence on data cleaning and Data Models: Analysis and Resolution
Chris Kenyon, Andrew Green

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how data cleaning and modeling choices impact VAR and ES risk measures, proposing standardization methods to improve consistency across institutions and market states.
Contribution
It introduces standardized data and Data-Model procedures to reduce subjectivity in VAR and ES calculations across different banks and market conditions.
Findings
Data cleaning significantly affects VAR and ES estimates.
Standardization proposals improve comparability of risk measures.
Empirical analysis on USD CDS and interest rate data demonstrates effects.
Abstract
Historical (Stressed-) Value-at-Risk ((S)VAR), and Expected Shortfall (ES), are widely used risk measures in regulatory capital and Initial Margin, i.e. funding, computations. However, whilst the definitions of VAR and ES are unambiguous, they depend on input distributions that are data-cleaning- and Data-Model-dependent. We quantify the scale of these effects from USD CDS (2004--2014), and from USD interest rates (1989--2014, single-curve setup before 2004, multi-curve setup after 2004), and make two standardisation proposals: for data; and for Data-Models. VAR and ES are required for lifetime portfolio calculations, i.e. collateral calls, which cover a wide range of market states. Hence we need standard, i.e. clean, complete, and common (i.e. identical for all banks), market data also covering this wide range of market states. This data is historically incomplete and not clean hence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCredit Risk and Financial Regulations · Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
